huwenjiao.hwj
7405825294
The allowlist added in the previous commit keyed the reviewed
sheet.range_set_style migration by bare RPC name ("update_range"), but
interface_ref holds the canonicalized JSON that parseTool produces via
canonicalRawJSON. The lookup therefore never matched, the carve-out was
effectively disabled, and the real gate failed with
`schema tool "sheet/sheet.range_set_style" changed interface_ref`.
The existing redirect test did not catch this: it registered the fixture entry
using its own value and then asserted with the same value, so any format would
have passed. That is the same mistake as keying a probe on the author's field
spelling instead of the wire contract.
- The allowlist entry now uses the compact canonical JSON, taken from the gate's
own output rather than from pretty-printed `dws schema`.
- TestCrossPlatformCoverageReviewedRedirectKeysAreCanonicalJSON recomputes every
registered key through canonicalRawJSON, so a bare name or a pretty-printed
variant fails locally instead of only in CI.
sheet export keeps its reviewed mcp + submit_export_job declaration. The comment
now records the known trade-off explicitly: --export-format csv is a mutually
exclusive branch that reads get_range_as_csv and never invokes the declared
submit_export_job, so this declaration does not cover the csv branch's backing
interface. Attributing that branch is left out of scope for this change.
Verified against the real gate, not just unit tests: all four Interface
Integrity checks pass (authoritative-interface-integrity,
check-command-compatibility, schema-compatibility, skill-command-integrity).
934 lines
39 KiB
Go
934 lines
39 KiB
Go
// Copyright 2026 Alibaba Group
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
|
|
package main
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"bytes"
|
|
"encoding/json"
|
|
"errors"
|
|
"os"
|
|
"path/filepath"
|
|
"strings"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
const completeSchemaJSON = `{
|
|
"kind":"schema",
|
|
"level":"catalog",
|
|
"products":[{
|
|
"id":"doc",
|
|
"tools":[{
|
|
"canonical_path":"doc.create",
|
|
"primary_cli_path":"doc create",
|
|
"interface_mode":"local",
|
|
"interface_ref":{"transport":"local"},
|
|
"availability":"available",
|
|
"parameters":{
|
|
"title":{
|
|
"type":"string",
|
|
"property":"title",
|
|
"required":true,
|
|
"cli_required":true,
|
|
"interface_type":"string",
|
|
"default":null,
|
|
"field_provenance":{}
|
|
},
|
|
"format":{
|
|
"type":["string","null"],
|
|
"property":"format",
|
|
"required":false,
|
|
"interface_type":"string",
|
|
"default":"markdown",
|
|
"enum":["markdown","text"],
|
|
"field_provenance":{}
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
"constraints":{"require_one_of":[["title","format"]]},
|
|
"positionals":[{
|
|
"name":"content",
|
|
"index":0,
|
|
"type":"string",
|
|
"required":false,
|
|
"description":"original prose"
|
|
}],
|
|
"effect":"write",
|
|
"risk":"medium",
|
|
"confirmation":"not_required",
|
|
"idempotency":"unknown",
|
|
"field_provenance":{}
|
|
}]
|
|
}]
|
|
}`
|
|
|
|
type failingWriter struct{}
|
|
|
|
func (failingWriter) Write([]byte) (int, error) { return 0, errors.New("write failed") }
|
|
|
|
func TestRunSchemaModes(t *testing.T) {
|
|
directory := t.TempDir()
|
|
raw := filepath.Join(directory, "raw.json")
|
|
writeTestFile(t, raw, completeSchemaJSON)
|
|
|
|
var normalized, stderr bytes.Buffer
|
|
if code := run([]string{"--normalize", raw}, &normalized, &stderr); code != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("normalize code=%d stderr=%s", code, stderr.String())
|
|
}
|
|
baseline := filepath.Join(directory, "baseline.json")
|
|
writeTestFile(t, baseline, normalized.String())
|
|
|
|
var stdout bytes.Buffer
|
|
stderr.Reset()
|
|
if code := run([]string{"--check", baseline, "--current", raw}, &stdout, &stderr); code != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("check code=%d stderr=%s", code, stderr.String())
|
|
}
|
|
if !strings.Contains(stdout.String(), "compatibility check: ok") {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected check output %q", stdout.String())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
stdout.Reset()
|
|
stderr.Reset()
|
|
if code := run([]string{"--merge", baseline, "--current", raw}, &stdout, &stderr); code != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("merge code=%d stderr=%s", code, stderr.String())
|
|
}
|
|
if !strings.Contains(stdout.String(), `"doc.create"`) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected merge output %q", stdout.String())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
empty := filepath.Join(directory, "empty.json")
|
|
writeTestFile(t, empty, `{"kind":"schema","products":[]}`)
|
|
stderr.Reset()
|
|
if code := run([]string{"--check", baseline, "--current", empty}, &stdout, &stderr); code != 2 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("empty current contract code=%d, want 2", code)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, args := range [][]string{
|
|
nil,
|
|
{"--normalize", raw, "--check", baseline},
|
|
{"--check", baseline},
|
|
{"--normalize", filepath.Join(directory, "missing")},
|
|
{"--unknown"},
|
|
} {
|
|
stderr.Reset()
|
|
if code := run(args, &stdout, &stderr); code != 2 {
|
|
t.Errorf("run(%v) code=%d, want 2", args, code)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
stderr.Reset()
|
|
if code := run([]string{"--normalize", raw}, failingWriter{}, &stderr); code != 2 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("write failure code=%d, want 2", code)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestNormalizeRawFileValidation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
body string
|
|
want string
|
|
}{
|
|
{name: "invalid json", body: `{`, want: "unexpected end"},
|
|
{name: "wrong kind", body: `{"kind":"other","products":[]}`, want: "unexpected kind"},
|
|
{name: "missing products", body: `{"kind":"schema"}`, want: "products array is missing"},
|
|
{name: "empty products", body: `{"kind":"schema","products":[]}`, want: "contains no products"},
|
|
{name: "empty tools", body: `{"kind":"schema","products":[{"id":"doc","tools":[]}]}`, want: "contains no tools"},
|
|
{name: "missing product id", body: `{"kind":"schema","products":[{"tools":[]}]}`, want: "product without id"},
|
|
{name: "duplicate product", body: `{"kind":"schema","products":[{"id":"doc"},{"id":"doc"}]}`, want: "duplicate product"},
|
|
{name: "compact tool rejected", body: `{"kind":"schema","products":[{"id":"doc","tools":[{"canonical_path":"doc.create","parameters":{},"effect":"write","risk":"medium","confirmation":"not_required","idempotency":"unknown","interface_mode":"local","availability":"available"}]}]}`, want: "not a complete schema --all leaf"},
|
|
{name: "invalid required", body: strings.Replace(completeSchemaJSON, `"required":true`, `"required":"yes"`, 1), want: "cannot unmarshal string"},
|
|
{name: "incomplete parameter", body: strings.Replace(completeSchemaJSON, `"field_provenance":{}`, `"incomplete":true`, 1), want: "not a complete schema --all parameter"},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, test := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
path := filepath.Join(t.TempDir(), "raw.json")
|
|
writeTestFile(t, path, test.body)
|
|
_, err := normalizeRawFile(path)
|
|
if err == nil || !strings.Contains(err.Error(), test.want) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("normalizeRawFile() error=%v, want %q", err, test.want)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestNormalizeCompleteSchemaPayload(t *testing.T) {
|
|
path := filepath.Join(t.TempDir(), "schema.json")
|
|
writeTestFile(t, path, completeSchemaJSON)
|
|
|
|
contract, err := normalizeRawFile(path)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
tool := contract.Products["doc"].Tools["doc.create"]
|
|
if tool.PrimaryCLIPath != "doc create" || tool.Constraints == "" || tool.Effect != "write" {
|
|
t.Fatalf("normalized tool contract is incomplete: %#v", tool)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(tool.Positionals) != 1 || tool.Positionals[0].Name != "content" {
|
|
t.Fatalf("normalized positionals = %#v", tool.Positionals)
|
|
}
|
|
if got := tool.Parameters["title"]; got.Type != `"string"` || !got.Required || got.Property != "title" || got.InterfaceType != "string" {
|
|
t.Fatalf("title parameter = %#v", got)
|
|
}
|
|
if got := tool.Parameters["format"]; got.Type != `["string","null"]` || got.Default != `"markdown"` {
|
|
t.Fatalf("format parameter = %#v", got)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestSchemaCompatibilityIgnoresPositionalDescription(t *testing.T) {
|
|
directory := t.TempDir()
|
|
baselinePath := filepath.Join(directory, "baseline.json")
|
|
currentPath := filepath.Join(directory, "current.json")
|
|
writeTestFile(t, baselinePath, completeSchemaJSON)
|
|
writeTestFile(t, currentPath, strings.Replace(completeSchemaJSON, "original prose", "edited prose only", 1))
|
|
|
|
baseline, err := normalizeRawFile(baselinePath)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
current, err := normalizeRawFile(currentPath)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if failures := checkCompatibility(baseline, current); len(failures) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("positional description edit should be compatible: %v", failures)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestSchemaTypeAndHelpers(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if got := schemaType(map[string]any{"type": []any{"string", "null"}}); got != `["string","null"]` {
|
|
t.Fatalf("schemaType(type)=%q", got)
|
|
}
|
|
if got := schemaType(map[string]any{"oneOf": []any{"a"}}); got != `oneOf:["a"]` {
|
|
t.Fatalf("schemaType(oneOf)=%q", got)
|
|
}
|
|
if got := schemaType(map[string]any{}); got != "unspecified" {
|
|
t.Fatalf("schemaType(empty)=%q", got)
|
|
}
|
|
if !enumNarrowed([]string{"a", "b"}, []string{"a"}) || enumNarrowed([]string{"a"}, []string{"a", "b"}) {
|
|
t.Fatal("enum narrowing classification is incorrect")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestSchemaCompatibilityAllowsAdditionsAndLooserInputs(t *testing.T) {
|
|
baseline := baselineContract()
|
|
mutateTool(&baseline, func(tool *toolSchema) {
|
|
tool.DryRun = ""
|
|
})
|
|
current := cloneContract(baseline)
|
|
mutateParameter(¤t, func(parameter *parameterSchema) {
|
|
parameter.Required = false
|
|
parameter.CLIRequired = false
|
|
parameter.Enum = append(parameter.Enum, "html")
|
|
})
|
|
mutateTool(¤t, func(tool *toolSchema) {
|
|
tool.Parameters["folder"] = parameterSchema{Type: `"string"`}
|
|
tool.DryRun = `{"mode":"native"}`
|
|
})
|
|
current.Products["doc"].Tools["doc.read"] = toolSchema{Parameters: map[string]parameterSchema{}}
|
|
current.Products["sheet"] = productSchema{Tools: map[string]toolSchema{}}
|
|
if failures := checkCompatibility(baseline, current); len(failures) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("compatible additions should pass: %v", failures)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestSchemaCompatibilityAllowsLooserAndAppendedOptionalPositionals(t *testing.T) {
|
|
baseline := baselineContract()
|
|
mutateTool(&baseline, func(tool *toolSchema) {
|
|
tool.Positionals[0].Required = true
|
|
})
|
|
current := cloneContract(baseline)
|
|
mutateTool(¤t, func(tool *toolSchema) {
|
|
tool.Positionals[0].Required = false
|
|
tool.Positionals = append(tool.Positionals, positionalSchema{
|
|
Name: "template",
|
|
Index: 1,
|
|
Type: "string",
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
if failures := checkCompatibility(baseline, current); len(failures) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("looser and appended optional positionals should pass: %v", failures)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestCompatiblePositionals(t *testing.T) {
|
|
baseline := []positionalSchema{
|
|
{Name: "content", Index: 0, Type: "string", Required: true},
|
|
{Name: "format", Index: 1, Type: "string"},
|
|
}
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
old []positionalSchema
|
|
current []positionalSchema
|
|
compatible bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{name: "unchanged", old: baseline, current: clonePositionals(baseline), compatible: true},
|
|
{name: "required becomes optional", old: baseline, current: []positionalSchema{
|
|
{Name: "content", Index: 0, Type: "string"},
|
|
{Name: "format", Index: 1, Type: "string"},
|
|
}, compatible: true},
|
|
{name: "append optional", old: baseline, current: append(clonePositionals(baseline), positionalSchema{
|
|
Name: "template", Index: 2, Type: "string",
|
|
}), compatible: true},
|
|
{name: "last positional becomes variadic", old: baseline, current: []positionalSchema{
|
|
{Name: "content", Index: 0, Type: "string", Required: true},
|
|
{Name: "format", Index: 1, Type: "string", Variadic: true},
|
|
}, compatible: true},
|
|
{name: "removed", old: baseline, current: clonePositionals(baseline[:1])},
|
|
{name: "renamed", old: baseline, current: []positionalSchema{
|
|
{Name: "body", Index: 0, Type: "string", Required: true},
|
|
{Name: "format", Index: 1, Type: "string"},
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "reindexed", old: baseline, current: []positionalSchema{
|
|
{Name: "content", Index: 1, Type: "string", Required: true},
|
|
{Name: "format", Index: 2, Type: "string"},
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "retyped", old: baseline, current: []positionalSchema{
|
|
{Name: "content", Index: 0, Type: "number", Required: true},
|
|
{Name: "format", Index: 1, Type: "string"},
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "optional becomes required", old: baseline, current: []positionalSchema{
|
|
{Name: "content", Index: 0, Type: "string", Required: true},
|
|
{Name: "format", Index: 1, Type: "string", Required: true},
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "append required", old: baseline, current: append(clonePositionals(baseline), positionalSchema{
|
|
Name: "template", Index: 2, Type: "string", Required: true,
|
|
})},
|
|
{name: "variadic becomes fixed", old: []positionalSchema{
|
|
{Name: "content", Index: 0, Type: "string", Variadic: true},
|
|
}, current: []positionalSchema{
|
|
{Name: "content", Index: 0, Type: "string"},
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "append after variadic", old: []positionalSchema{
|
|
{Name: "content", Index: 0, Type: "string", Variadic: true},
|
|
}, current: []positionalSchema{
|
|
{Name: "content", Index: 0, Type: "string", Variadic: true},
|
|
{Name: "format", Index: 1, Type: "string"},
|
|
}},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, test := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if got := compatiblePositionals(test.old, test.current); got != test.compatible {
|
|
t.Fatalf("compatiblePositionals() = %t, want %t", got, test.compatible)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestSchemaCompatibilityRejectsContractDrift(t *testing.T) {
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
want string
|
|
mutate func(*schemaContract)
|
|
}{
|
|
{name: "removed product", want: "historical schema product", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) { delete(contract.Products, "doc") }},
|
|
{name: "removed tool", want: "historical schema tool", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) { delete(contract.Products["doc"].Tools, "doc.create") }},
|
|
{name: "removed parameter", want: "lost parameter", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) { delete(tool.Parameters, "title") })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "changed type", want: "changed type", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateParameter(contract, func(parameter *parameterSchema) { parameter.Type = `"number"` })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "new required", want: "newly required", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateParameter(contract, func(parameter *parameterSchema) { parameter.Required = true })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "new cli required", want: "newly cli_required", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateParameter(contract, func(parameter *parameterSchema) { parameter.CLIRequired = true })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "changed required when", want: "changed required_when", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateParameter(contract, func(parameter *parameterSchema) { parameter.RequiredWhen = "scope=team" })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "changed property", want: "changed property", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateParameter(contract, func(parameter *parameterSchema) { parameter.Property = "subject" })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "cleared property without a reviewed exclusion", want: "changed property", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateParameter(contract, func(parameter *parameterSchema) {
|
|
parameter.Property = ""
|
|
parameter.PropertySource = "flag_name_inference"
|
|
})
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "redirected property despite a reviewed exclusion", want: "changed property", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateParameter(contract, func(parameter *parameterSchema) {
|
|
parameter.Property = "subject"
|
|
parameter.PropertySource = propertySourceReviewedMappingExclusion
|
|
})
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "changed interface type", want: "changed interface_type", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateParameter(contract, func(parameter *parameterSchema) { parameter.InterfaceType = "integer" })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "changed default", want: "changed default", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateParameter(contract, func(parameter *parameterSchema) { parameter.Default = `"html"` })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "changed interface default", want: "changed interface_default", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateParameter(contract, func(parameter *parameterSchema) { parameter.InterfaceDefault = `"html"` })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "changed format", want: "changed format", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateParameter(contract, func(parameter *parameterSchema) { parameter.Format = "uri" })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "narrowed enum", want: "narrowed enum", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateParameter(contract, func(parameter *parameterSchema) { parameter.Enum = []string{"markdown"} })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "changed primary cli path", want: "changed primary_cli_path", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) { tool.PrimaryCLIPath = "doc make" })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "changed interface mode", want: "changed interface_mode", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) { tool.InterfaceMode = "mcp" })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "changed constraints", want: "changed constraints", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) { tool.Constraints = `{}` })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "changed positionals", want: "changed positionals", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) { tool.Positionals[0].Name = "id" })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "changed interface mapping", want: "changed interface_ref", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) { tool.InterfaceRef = `{"transport":"mcp"}` })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "changed availability", want: "changed availability", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) { tool.Availability = "unavailable" })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "changed confirmation", want: "changed confirmation", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) { tool.Confirmation = "user_required" })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "changed risk", want: "changed risk", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) { mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) { tool.Risk = "high" }) }},
|
|
{name: "changed effect", want: "changed effect", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) { tool.Effect = "destructive" })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "changed idempotency", want: "changed idempotency", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) { tool.Idempotency = "idempotent" })
|
|
}},
|
|
{name: "removed dry run", want: "changed or removed dry_run", mutate: func(contract *schemaContract) { mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) { tool.DryRun = "" }) }},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, test := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
current := baselineContract()
|
|
test.mutate(¤t)
|
|
failures := strings.Join(checkCompatibility(baselineContract(), current), "\n")
|
|
if !strings.Contains(failures, test.want) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("failures=%q, want %q", failures, test.want)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestMergeContracts(t *testing.T) {
|
|
historical := baselineContract()
|
|
current := cloneContract(historical)
|
|
mutateTool(¤t, func(tool *toolSchema) {
|
|
tool.Parameters["folder"] = parameterSchema{Type: `"string"`}
|
|
})
|
|
merged, failures := mergeContracts(historical, current)
|
|
if len(failures) != 0 || merged.Products["doc"].Tools["doc.create"].Parameters["folder"].Type == "" {
|
|
t.Fatalf("merge=%v failures=%v", merged, failures)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mutateParameter(¤t, func(parameter *parameterSchema) {
|
|
parameter.Type = `"number"`
|
|
})
|
|
if _, failures := mergeContracts(historical, current); len(failures) == 0 {
|
|
t.Fatal("incompatible merge unexpectedly passed")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func baselineContract() schemaContract {
|
|
return schemaContract{Version: schemaContractVersion, Products: map[string]productSchema{
|
|
"doc": {Tools: map[string]toolSchema{
|
|
"doc.create": {
|
|
PrimaryCLIPath: "doc create",
|
|
InterfaceMode: "local",
|
|
InterfaceRef: `{"transport":"local"}`,
|
|
Availability: "available",
|
|
Parameters: map[string]parameterSchema{
|
|
"title": {
|
|
Type: `"string"`,
|
|
Property: "title",
|
|
InterfaceType: "string",
|
|
},
|
|
"format": {
|
|
Type: `"string"`,
|
|
Property: "format",
|
|
InterfaceType: "string",
|
|
Default: `"markdown"`,
|
|
Enum: []string{"markdown", "text"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
Constraints: `{"require_one_of":[["title","format"]]}`,
|
|
Positionals: []positionalSchema{{
|
|
Name: "content",
|
|
Index: 0,
|
|
Type: "string",
|
|
}},
|
|
DryRun: `{"mode":"native"}`,
|
|
Effect: "write",
|
|
Risk: "medium",
|
|
Confirmation: "not_required",
|
|
Idempotency: "unknown",
|
|
},
|
|
}},
|
|
}}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func mutateTool(contract *schemaContract, mutate func(*toolSchema)) {
|
|
product := contract.Products["doc"]
|
|
tool := product.Tools["doc.create"]
|
|
mutate(&tool)
|
|
product.Tools["doc.create"] = tool
|
|
contract.Products["doc"] = product
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func mutateParameter(contract *schemaContract, mutate func(*parameterSchema)) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) {
|
|
parameter := tool.Parameters["format"]
|
|
mutate(¶meter)
|
|
tool.Parameters["format"] = parameter
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func clonePositionals(source []positionalSchema) []positionalSchema {
|
|
return append([]positionalSchema(nil), source...)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func writeTestFile(t *testing.T, path, body string) {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
if err := os.WriteFile(path, []byte(body), 0o600); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestCrossPlatformCoverageSchemaCompatMCPRetirementAndConstraintExpansion covers
|
|
// the MCP pin retirement allowance (clearing interface_type) and declare≡execute
|
|
// constraint member expansion used by the platform coverage gate.
|
|
func TestCrossPlatformCoverageSchemaCompatMCPRetirementAndConstraintExpansion(t *testing.T) {
|
|
baseline := baselineContract()
|
|
current := cloneContract(baseline)
|
|
mutateParameter(¤t, func(parameter *parameterSchema) {
|
|
parameter.InterfaceType = ""
|
|
})
|
|
mutateTool(¤t, func(tool *toolSchema) {
|
|
tool.Constraints = `{"require_one_of":[["title","format","legacy-format"]],"mutually_exclusive":[["title","format","legacy-title"]]}`
|
|
})
|
|
// Baseline has require_one_of only; a new mutually-exclusive group that
|
|
// restricts two historical public parameters must remain incompatible.
|
|
if failures := checkCompatibility(baseline, current); len(failures) == 0 {
|
|
t.Fatal("adding a new constraint group must fail compatibility")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Match baseline shape: expand require_one_of members only, clear interface_type.
|
|
current = cloneContract(baseline)
|
|
mutateParameter(¤t, func(parameter *parameterSchema) {
|
|
parameter.InterfaceType = ""
|
|
})
|
|
mutateTool(¤t, func(tool *toolSchema) {
|
|
tool.Constraints = `{"require_one_of":[["title","format","legacy-format"]]}`
|
|
})
|
|
if failures := checkCompatibility(baseline, current); len(failures) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("clearing interface_type and expanding constraint members should pass: %v", failures)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Hidden-sibling expansion from empty historical constraints remains allowed.
|
|
emptyConstraints := cloneContract(baseline)
|
|
mutateTool(&emptyConstraints, func(tool *toolSchema) {
|
|
tool.Constraints = ""
|
|
title := tool.Parameters["title"]
|
|
title.Required = true
|
|
tool.Parameters["title"] = title
|
|
delete(tool.Parameters, "format")
|
|
})
|
|
expanded := cloneContract(emptyConstraints)
|
|
mutateTool(&expanded, func(tool *toolSchema) {
|
|
tool.Constraints = `{"require_one_of":[["title","hidden-alias"]],"mutually_exclusive":[["title","hidden-alias"]]}`
|
|
title := tool.Parameters["title"]
|
|
title.Required = false
|
|
tool.Parameters["title"] = title
|
|
})
|
|
if failures := checkCompatibility(emptyConstraints, expanded); len(failures) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("hidden-sibling constraint expansion should pass: %v", failures)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if groups, ok := parseConstraintGroups(""); !ok || len(groups["require_one_of"]) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("empty constraints parse = %#v ok=%v", groups, ok)
|
|
}
|
|
if !stringSetContainsAll(map[string]bool{"a": true, "b": true}, map[string]bool{"a": true}) ||
|
|
stringSetContainsAll(map[string]bool{"a": true}, map[string]bool{"a": true, "b": true}) {
|
|
t.Fatal("stringSetContainsAll classification is incorrect")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// compatibleHiddenSiblingConstraintExpansion false branches.
|
|
if compatibleHiddenSiblingConstraintExpansion(
|
|
toolSchema{Constraints: "", Parameters: map[string]parameterSchema{"a": {Required: true}}},
|
|
toolSchema{Constraints: "{", Parameters: map[string]parameterSchema{"a": {}}},
|
|
) {
|
|
t.Fatal("invalid projected constraints must not expand")
|
|
}
|
|
oldRequired := toolSchema{
|
|
Constraints: "",
|
|
Parameters: map[string]parameterSchema{"a": {Required: true}},
|
|
}
|
|
if compatibleHiddenSiblingConstraintExpansion(oldRequired, toolSchema{
|
|
Constraints: `{"require_together":[["a","b"]],"require_one_of":[["a","hidden"]]}`,
|
|
Parameters: map[string]parameterSchema{"a": {}},
|
|
}) {
|
|
t.Fatal("require_together projection must not expand")
|
|
}
|
|
if compatibleHiddenSiblingConstraintExpansion(oldRequired, toolSchema{
|
|
Constraints: `{"require_one_of":[["a"]]}`,
|
|
Parameters: map[string]parameterSchema{"a": {}},
|
|
}) {
|
|
t.Fatal("single-member group must not expand")
|
|
}
|
|
if compatibleHiddenSiblingConstraintExpansion(oldRequired, toolSchema{
|
|
Constraints: `{"require_one_of":[["a","","hidden"]]}`,
|
|
Parameters: map[string]parameterSchema{"a": {}},
|
|
}) {
|
|
t.Fatal("empty constraint member must not expand")
|
|
}
|
|
if compatibleHiddenSiblingConstraintExpansion(oldRequired, toolSchema{
|
|
Constraints: `{"require_one_of":[["hidden","ghost"]]}`,
|
|
Parameters: map[string]parameterSchema{"a": {}},
|
|
}) {
|
|
t.Fatal("unpublished-only group must not expand")
|
|
}
|
|
if compatibleHiddenSiblingConstraintExpansion(oldRequired, toolSchema{
|
|
Constraints: `{"require_one_of":[["a","b"]]}`,
|
|
Parameters: map[string]parameterSchema{"a": {}, "b": {}},
|
|
}) {
|
|
t.Fatal("published-only group must not expand")
|
|
}
|
|
if compatibleHiddenSiblingConstraintExpansion(oldRequired, toolSchema{
|
|
Constraints: `{"require_one_of":[["a","hidden"]]}`,
|
|
Parameters: map[string]parameterSchema{"a": {Required: true}},
|
|
}) {
|
|
t.Fatal("still-required sole published member must not expand")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Changing interface_type to a different non-empty value remains incompatible.
|
|
typed := cloneContract(baseline)
|
|
mutateParameter(&typed, func(parameter *parameterSchema) { parameter.InterfaceType = "integer" })
|
|
if failures := checkCompatibility(baseline, typed); !strings.Contains(strings.Join(failures, "\n"), "changed interface_type") {
|
|
t.Fatalf("non-empty interface_type change should fail: %v", failures)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestCrossPlatformCoverageSchemaCompatAdditiveConstraintEvolution(t *testing.T) {
|
|
oldTool := toolSchema{
|
|
Parameters: map[string]parameterSchema{
|
|
"target": {},
|
|
"limit": {},
|
|
},
|
|
Constraints: `{"require_one_of":[["target","legacy-target"]]}`,
|
|
}
|
|
compatible := oldTool
|
|
compatible.Constraints = `{"require_one_of":[["target","legacy-target","new-target"]],"mutually_exclusive":[["target","new-target"],["new-a","new-b"]],"require_together":[["new-a","new-b"]]}`
|
|
if !compatibleAdditiveConstraintEvolution(oldTool, compatible) {
|
|
t.Fatal("member expansion and additive alias-only groups must remain compatible")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
twoHistorical := compatible
|
|
twoHistorical.Constraints = `{"require_one_of":[["target","legacy-target","new-target"]],"mutually_exclusive":[["target","limit","new-target"]]}`
|
|
if compatibleAdditiveConstraintEvolution(oldTool, twoHistorical) {
|
|
t.Fatal("new mutex group restricting two historical parameters must fail")
|
|
}
|
|
newRequirement := compatible
|
|
newRequirement.Constraints = `{"require_one_of":[["target","legacy-target","new-target"],["new-a","new-b"]]}`
|
|
if compatibleAdditiveConstraintEvolution(oldTool, newRequirement) {
|
|
t.Fatal("new require_one_of group must fail")
|
|
}
|
|
requireHistoricalTogether := compatible
|
|
requireHistoricalTogether.Constraints = `{"require_one_of":[["target","legacy-target","new-target"]],"require_together":[["limit","new-limit"]]}`
|
|
if compatibleAdditiveConstraintEvolution(oldTool, requireHistoricalTogether) {
|
|
t.Fatal("new require_together group containing a historical parameter must fail")
|
|
}
|
|
removedOldGroup := compatible
|
|
removedOldGroup.Constraints = `{"mutually_exclusive":[["new-a","new-b"]]}`
|
|
if compatibleAdditiveConstraintEvolution(oldTool, removedOldGroup) {
|
|
t.Fatal("removing a historical group must fail")
|
|
}
|
|
invalid := compatible
|
|
invalid.Constraints = "{"
|
|
if compatibleAdditiveConstraintEvolution(oldTool, invalid) {
|
|
t.Fatal("invalid constraints must fail closed")
|
|
}
|
|
emptyHistoricalGroup := oldTool
|
|
emptyHistoricalGroup.Constraints = `{"require_one_of":[[]]}`
|
|
if compatibleAdditiveConstraintEvolution(emptyHistoricalGroup, compatible) {
|
|
t.Fatal("empty historical constraint group must fail closed")
|
|
}
|
|
historicalMutex := oldTool
|
|
historicalMutex.Constraints = `{"mutually_exclusive":[["target","legacy-target"]]}`
|
|
historicalMutexExpanded := oldTool
|
|
historicalMutexExpanded.Constraints = `{"mutually_exclusive":[["target","legacy-target","limit"]]}`
|
|
if compatibleAdditiveConstraintEvolution(historicalMutex, historicalMutexExpanded) {
|
|
t.Fatal("adding a historical parameter to an existing mutex group must fail")
|
|
}
|
|
historicalTogether := oldTool
|
|
historicalTogether.Constraints = `{"require_together":[["target","legacy-target"]]}`
|
|
historicalTogetherExpanded := oldTool
|
|
historicalTogetherExpanded.Constraints = `{"require_together":[["target","legacy-target","limit"]]}`
|
|
if compatibleAdditiveConstraintEvolution(historicalTogether, historicalTogetherExpanded) {
|
|
t.Fatal("adding a historical parameter to an existing require-together group must fail")
|
|
}
|
|
historicalOneOf := oldTool
|
|
historicalOneOf.Constraints = `{"require_one_of":[["target","legacy-target","limit"]]}`
|
|
if !compatibleAdditiveConstraintEvolution(oldTool, historicalOneOf) {
|
|
t.Fatal("adding a historical parameter to require-one-of only loosens the contract")
|
|
}
|
|
gateBaseline := baselineContract()
|
|
mutateTool(&gateBaseline, func(tool *toolSchema) {
|
|
tool.Parameters["folder"] = parameterSchema{Type: `"string"`}
|
|
tool.Constraints = `{"mutually_exclusive":[["title","format"]]}`
|
|
})
|
|
gateCurrent := cloneContract(gateBaseline)
|
|
mutateTool(&gateCurrent, func(tool *toolSchema) {
|
|
tool.Constraints = `{"mutually_exclusive":[["title","format","folder"]]}`
|
|
})
|
|
if failures := checkCompatibility(gateBaseline, gateCurrent); len(failures) == 0 {
|
|
t.Fatal("compatibility gate must reject an existing mutex group gaining a historical parameter")
|
|
}
|
|
multipleHistoricalGroups := oldTool
|
|
multipleHistoricalGroups.Constraints = `{"require_one_of":[["target"],["limit"]]}`
|
|
multipleExpandedGroups := oldTool
|
|
multipleExpandedGroups.Constraints = `{"require_one_of":[["target","limit"],["limit","new-limit"]]}`
|
|
if !compatibleAdditiveConstraintEvolution(multipleHistoricalGroups, multipleExpandedGroups) {
|
|
t.Fatal("each historical group must match a distinct expanded group")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Clearing a property through the reviewed mapping exclusion table is the one
|
|
// accepted shape, mirroring the interface_type retirement allowance. A leaf
|
|
// whose backing RPC moved to a nested payload has no honest flat property to
|
|
// publish; the alternatives are naming a field the request no longer contains,
|
|
// or letting flag_name_inference publish a name that appears in no request.
|
|
func TestCrossPlatformCoverageSchemaCompatPropertyClearingExclusion(t *testing.T) {
|
|
baseline := baselineContract()
|
|
|
|
// Accepted: non-empty -> empty, resolved through a reviewed exclusion.
|
|
current := cloneContract(baseline)
|
|
mutateParameter(¤t, func(parameter *parameterSchema) {
|
|
parameter.Property = ""
|
|
parameter.PropertySource = propertySourceReviewedMappingExclusion
|
|
})
|
|
if failures := checkCompatibility(baseline, current); len(failures) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("clearing property through a reviewed exclusion should pass: %v", failures)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Every neighbouring shape must stay incompatible, so the carve-out cannot
|
|
// be widened by accident.
|
|
for _, tc := range []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
property string
|
|
source string
|
|
}{
|
|
{"cleared by inference", "", "flag_name_inference"},
|
|
{"cleared by a native annotation", "", "native_annotation"},
|
|
{"cleared with no recorded source", "", ""},
|
|
{"redirected to another non-empty value", "cellStyles", propertySourceReviewedMappingExclusion},
|
|
} {
|
|
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
drifted := cloneContract(baseline)
|
|
mutateParameter(&drifted, func(parameter *parameterSchema) {
|
|
parameter.Property = tc.property
|
|
parameter.PropertySource = tc.source
|
|
})
|
|
failures := checkCompatibility(baseline, drifted)
|
|
if len(failures) == 0 {
|
|
t.Fatal("must remain incompatible")
|
|
}
|
|
var sawProperty bool
|
|
for _, failure := range failures {
|
|
if strings.Contains(failure, "changed property") {
|
|
sawProperty = true
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if !sawProperty {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected a changed property failure, got %v", failures)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A parameter that never published a property must not gain one silently
|
|
// just because it carries an exclusion source.
|
|
populated := cloneContract(baseline)
|
|
mutateParameter(&populated, func(parameter *parameterSchema) { parameter.Property = "" })
|
|
gained := cloneContract(populated)
|
|
mutateParameter(&gained, func(parameter *parameterSchema) {
|
|
parameter.Property = "backgroundColors"
|
|
parameter.PropertySource = propertySourceReviewedMappingExclusion
|
|
})
|
|
if failures := checkCompatibility(populated, gained); len(failures) == 0 {
|
|
t.Fatal("populating a previously empty property must stay incompatible")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Repointing a leaf at a different backing RPC is accepted only when the
|
|
// CLI-facing contract is provably unchanged. interface_ref is audit metadata;
|
|
// nothing reads it at runtime, so a stale value misinforms a reader rather than
|
|
// misrouting a call. The gate is that no other compatibility check for the tool
|
|
// failed — that is the operative meaning of "the contract is unchanged".
|
|
// reviewedInterfaceRefRedirect 的键值必须是 parseTool 经 canonicalRawJSON 实际产出
|
|
// 的紧凑 JSON。这条守卫是必要的：该表先前误登记为裸 RPC 名（"update_range"），后又
|
|
// 误登记为带空格的美化 JSON，两次都让豁免完全失效——而上面的用例是用测试自己注册
|
|
// 的值断言的，所以两次都通过了，只有真实门禁才报错。这里用 canonicalRawJSON 复算
|
|
// 期望值，把格式锚定到生产代码而不是作者的书写习惯。
|
|
func TestCrossPlatformCoverageReviewedRedirectKeysAreCanonicalJSON(t *testing.T) {
|
|
canon := func(raw string) string {
|
|
got, err := canonicalRawJSON(json.RawMessage(raw))
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("canonicalRawJSON(%s): %v", raw, err)
|
|
}
|
|
return got
|
|
}
|
|
if len(reviewedInterfaceRefRedirect) == 0 {
|
|
t.Fatal("redirect allowlist 为空：若确已清空，请同时删除这条守卫")
|
|
}
|
|
for toolPath, pairs := range reviewedInterfaceRefRedirect {
|
|
if len(pairs) == 0 {
|
|
t.Errorf("%s: 空的 redirect 表项没有意义", toolPath)
|
|
}
|
|
for oldRef, newRef := range pairs {
|
|
if got := canon(oldRef); got != oldRef {
|
|
t.Errorf("%s: old ref 不是规范形态\n 登记: %s\n 规范: %s", toolPath, oldRef, got)
|
|
}
|
|
if got := canon(newRef); got != newRef {
|
|
t.Errorf("%s: new ref 不是规范形态\n 登记: %s\n 规范: %s", toolPath, newRef, got)
|
|
}
|
|
if oldRef == newRef {
|
|
t.Errorf("%s: old 与 new 相同，不构成 redirect", toolPath)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestCrossPlatformCoverageSchemaCompatInterfaceRefRedirect(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// The redirect carve-out only accepts an explicitly reviewed tool + old→new
|
|
// ref pair. Register the fixture's path for the duration of this test so the
|
|
// accepted shapes below exercise the allowlist rather than a blanket rule.
|
|
const fixturePath = "doc/doc.create"
|
|
oldRef := `{"product_id":"sheet","rpc_name":"update_range"}`
|
|
newRef := `{"product_id":"sheet","rpc_name":"set_cell_range"}`
|
|
reviewedInterfaceRefRedirect[fixturePath] = map[string]string{oldRef: newRef}
|
|
t.Cleanup(func() { delete(reviewedInterfaceRefRedirect, fixturePath) })
|
|
|
|
// The baseline fixture is interface_mode=local; the carve-out only applies to
|
|
// mcp-backed leaves, so establish an mcp baseline first.
|
|
baseline := cloneContract(baselineContract())
|
|
mutateTool(&baseline, func(tool *toolSchema) {
|
|
tool.InterfaceMode = interfaceModeMCP
|
|
tool.InterfaceRef = oldRef
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Accepted: mcp -> mcp, both refs non-empty, the pair is reviewed, nothing
|
|
// else changed.
|
|
redirected := cloneContract(baseline)
|
|
mutateTool(&redirected, func(tool *toolSchema) { tool.InterfaceRef = newRef })
|
|
if failures := checkCompatibility(baseline, redirected); len(failures) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("a reviewed interface_ref redirect should pass: %v", failures)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Paired with a reviewed property clearing, which is the realistic shape:
|
|
// a leaf moving to a nested payload loses its flat property names.
|
|
withCleared := cloneContract(redirected)
|
|
mutateParameter(&withCleared, func(parameter *parameterSchema) {
|
|
parameter.Property = ""
|
|
parameter.PropertySource = propertySourceReviewedMappingExclusion
|
|
})
|
|
if failures := checkCompatibility(baseline, withCleared); len(failures) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("redirect plus reviewed property clearing should pass: %v", failures)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Rejected shapes. Each must still report the redirect, so a surface change
|
|
// cannot ride along behind a backend move.
|
|
for _, tc := range []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
mutate func(*schemaContract)
|
|
}{
|
|
{"ref removed rather than redirected", func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) { tool.InterfaceRef = "" })
|
|
}},
|
|
{"mode moved to composite", func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) {
|
|
tool.InterfaceMode = "composite"
|
|
tool.InterfaceRef = ""
|
|
})
|
|
}},
|
|
{"mode moved away from mcp while the ref is redirected", func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) {
|
|
tool.InterfaceMode = "local"
|
|
tool.InterfaceRef = `{"product_id":"sheet","rpc_name":"set_cell_range"}`
|
|
})
|
|
}},
|
|
{"a parameter became required", func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) { tool.InterfaceRef = `{"product_id":"sheet","rpc_name":"set_cell_range"}` })
|
|
mutateParameter(contract, func(parameter *parameterSchema) { parameter.Required = true })
|
|
}},
|
|
{"a parameter type moved", func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) { tool.InterfaceRef = `{"product_id":"sheet","rpc_name":"set_cell_range"}` })
|
|
mutateParameter(contract, func(parameter *parameterSchema) { parameter.Type = "integer" })
|
|
}},
|
|
{"a property was cleared without a reviewed exclusion", func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) { tool.InterfaceRef = `{"product_id":"sheet","rpc_name":"set_cell_range"}` })
|
|
mutateParameter(contract, func(parameter *parameterSchema) {
|
|
parameter.Property = ""
|
|
parameter.PropertySource = "flag_name_inference"
|
|
})
|
|
}},
|
|
{"a confirmation gate moved", func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) {
|
|
tool.InterfaceRef = `{"product_id":"sheet","rpc_name":"set_cell_range"}`
|
|
tool.Confirmation = "user_required"
|
|
})
|
|
}},
|
|
{"a parameter was dropped", func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) {
|
|
tool.InterfaceRef = newRef
|
|
delete(tool.Parameters, "title")
|
|
})
|
|
}},
|
|
// The allowlist itself must be load-bearing: a redirect that is not an
|
|
// exact reviewed tool + old→new pair stays incompatible even when the rest
|
|
// of the contract is untouched. Schema shape cannot prove two RPCs share
|
|
// permissions, error taxonomy, or side effects.
|
|
{"redirect to a ref that is not the reviewed target", func(contract *schemaContract) {
|
|
mutateTool(contract, func(tool *toolSchema) {
|
|
tool.InterfaceRef = `{"product_id":"sheet","rpc_name":"some_other_rpc"}`
|
|
})
|
|
}},
|
|
} {
|
|
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
drifted := cloneContract(baseline)
|
|
tc.mutate(&drifted)
|
|
failures := checkCompatibility(baseline, drifted)
|
|
var sawRef bool
|
|
for _, failure := range failures {
|
|
if strings.Contains(failure, "changed interface_ref") {
|
|
sawRef = true
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if !sawRef {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected the redirect to stay reported, got %v", failures)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The allowlist must be load-bearing: the exact same old→new pair on a tool
|
|
// with no reviewed entry stays incompatible. Asserted outside the table
|
|
// because the registration has to survive until checkCompatibility runs.
|
|
t.Run("redirect on a tool absent from the reviewed allowlist", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
saved := reviewedInterfaceRefRedirect[fixturePath]
|
|
delete(reviewedInterfaceRefRedirect, fixturePath)
|
|
defer func() { reviewedInterfaceRefRedirect[fixturePath] = saved }()
|
|
|
|
unlisted := cloneContract(baseline)
|
|
mutateTool(&unlisted, func(tool *toolSchema) { tool.InterfaceRef = newRef })
|
|
failures := checkCompatibility(baseline, unlisted)
|
|
var sawRef bool
|
|
for _, failure := range failures {
|
|
if strings.Contains(failure, "changed interface_ref") {
|
|
sawRef = true
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if !sawRef {
|
|
t.Fatalf("an unlisted tool must not get the redirect carve-out, got %v", failures)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|